Skip to main content

Educator resource

Language Lab Alternative for Modern Language Classes

Compare browser-based language labs and ChitterChatter for live discussion, individual AI practice, and teacher review.

Overview

Modern language labs can already work online. Sanako Connect, for example, supports live pair and group discussion as well as independent assignments. ChitterChatter focuses on individual conversations with AI partners, using teacher-created scenarios and work that instructors can review. Choose around the speaking task you need, not whether a tool is called a lab.

Students practice on their own devices with microphone access.
Teachers assign individual AI conversations tied to course goals.
Departments can pilot speaking practice before committing to a larger rollout.
Teachers can review class speaking activity without reserving a dedicated lab room.

Where a modern language lab fits

A language lab can be a strong choice when students need to speak with each other while an instructor monitors the class. Sanako Connect combines live pair and group work with recording tasks and teacher feedback. Those are useful capabilities to keep if they already serve your course.

Where ChitterChatter fits

Choose ChitterChatter when students need a conversation partner between class meetings or repeated rehearsal of a specific scenario. Each student speaks with an AI partner that responds to their answers, then reviews their completed practice. Teachers choose the task and how student work is shared and assessed.

  • Rehearse a course topic before discussing it with classmates.
  • Practice asking for clarification when an answer is unexpected.
  • Repeat a conversation with one improvement in mind.

What to check in a small pilot

Try one assignment with the devices, language, and review settings you intend to use. ChitterChatter is not a replacement for every live lab feature, and AI recognition or feedback can be wrong. Check the student's words and recording before relying on an AI suggestion.

  • Interaction: do students need an AI partner, a classmate, or both?
  • Control: can you set the task and decide what counts as completed or submitted?
  • Review: can you find the evidence you need without reviewing every minute?
  • Access: can students join, allow microphone access, and finish on their usual devices?
  • Data handling: do the privacy, storage, and deletion terms fit your institution?

About this comparison

Updated September 6, 2026 using Sanako's official product information and ChitterChatter's current workflow. This is a feature comparison, not a claim that one tool produces better learning results. ChitterChatter is not affiliated with Sanako.

Sanako Connect and ChitterChatter at a glance

Sanako Connect is one example of a modern language lab, not a stand-in for every provider. Both tools support browser-based practice and teacher review, with different options for interaction.

Conversation
Sanako Connect: live student pairs and groups, plus individual recording tasks.
ChitterChatter: individual spoken conversations with an AI partner.
Instructor control
Sanako Connect: create exercises, arrange groups, and monitor live discussions.
ChitterChatter: set activity language, level, scenario, goals, and assignment settings.
Review
Sanako Connect: collect recordings and give text or voice feedback.
ChitterChatter: review completion and, when shared by the assignment, transcripts, audio, and AI feedback.
Access
Sanako Connect: students join browser-based lessons through a link or QR code.
ChitterChatter: students sign in to their class and open assigned practice in a browser.

Questions teachers usually ask first

Can ChitterChatter replace a language lab?

ChitterChatter can support assigned AI conversations, recordings, transcripts, feedback, and teacher review. If you need live student pairing, group monitoring, or specialized lab controls, compare those needs separately before replacing your existing tool.

Do students need special lab hardware?

No. ChitterChatter runs in a modern browser on student devices. Students need a microphone and a quiet place to speak.

How is this different from recording tools?

A simple recorder captures a response; modern language labs may also support live pair and group discussion. ChitterChatter focuses on individual conversations with AI partners, followed by feedback and review of completed practice.

Can a department pilot it before scaling?

Yes. Instructors can start with a free account, and departments can contact ChitterChatter about bulk student access or a broader pilot.

Is student data private?

Student conversations stay in ChitterChatter for class practice and review. ChitterChatter does not sell or license student audio, use it for advertising, or use it to train public models. Service providers process data only as needed to provide the service.